The Dismissal Deniers
Next Tuesday marks the 50th anniversary of the day when governor-general Sir John Kerr lawfully used a constitutional power to resolve a political deadlock and secure government funding for the Crown. Despite this, Sir John has faced relentless criticism, even after his death.
Clarifying Sir John Kerr's Role
It should be clear that Sir John Kerr did not remove a grossly incompetent government—the Australian people did. Kerr's action provided the chance for this outcome, which was a consequence rather than the primary reason for his decision.
Expectations vs Reality of the Anniversary
The anniversary was expected to reignite attacks on Sir John Kerr. However, a coordinated three-part campaign has emerged, including a new Whitlam biography, a Sky News Australia documentary, and an event by the Museum of Australian Democracy streamed live from Old Parliament House.
The Anniversary Event
The event, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, features outspoken Kerr critics such as journalists Paul Kelly, Troy Bramston, and academic Professor Jenny Hocking. Most participants align with the Labor Party, predicting a highly partisan atmosphere around the parliamentary triangle on this significant day.
"Sir John Kerr simply gave them the opportunity to do so. And more importantly, that was a by-product of – not the motivation for – his decision."
"The latter, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, will include such partisan players as journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston and academic Professor Jenny Hocking, all fierce Kerr antagonists."
Author's summary: The 50th anniversary of Sir John Kerr’s dismissal power evokes polarized reactions, revealing enduring political divisions about his legacy and motives.